Agricultural and Biofuel News - ENN

Friday, April 11, 2014

Alert! Fraudulent Organic Certifications!


Fraudulent organic certificates listing the following businesses are in use and have recently been reported to the NOP: 


These certificates falsely represent agricultural products as certified organic under the USDA organic regulations, violating the Organic Foods Production Act of 1990. 

The vigilance of the organic community is a vital force in ensuring organic integrity.  Organic handlers should continue to review certificates carefully, validate with their certifying agents where needed, and send any suspicious certificates to the NOP Compliance and Enforcement team.

Any use of this certificate or other fraudulent documents to market, label, or sell non-organic agricultural products as organic can result in a civil penalty of up to $11,000 per violation. 

Persons with information regarding the production or use of this or other fraudulent NOP certificates are asked to send information to the NOP Compliance and Enforcement Division.



About the Agricultural Marketing Service
USDA's Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) facilitates the competitive and efficient marketing of agricultural products. Through its National Organic Program, AMS facilitates trade and ensures the integrity of organic agricultural products by consistently implementing organic standards and enforcing compliance with the regulations throughout the world. Learn more.
     

Thursday, April 10, 2014

New Anti-GMO-Labeling Bill Would Deny You Your Right to Know

For anyone who wants to know whether there are GMOs in the food supply, a new bill introduced by Congressman Mike Pompeo (R-KS) is essentially a "slap in the face of all average citizens," as former Stonyfield Farms CEO Gary Hirschberg called it.
The bill is titled "The Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act" but groups outraged by what it's proposing have dubbed it the "Deny Americans the Right to Know" or DARK Act. And here's why: If passed, the bill would prohibit any state or locality from passing a law requiring genetically engineered (GE) foods to be labeled, and it prevents the FDA from passing any requirements for GE foods. It allows foods labeled as "natural" to contain GE ingredients, and it would permit meat, milk, eggs and dairy from animals fed GE-based food to be labeled GMO-free.

The bill comes straight out of the playbook of the Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA), the food industry's lobbying arm. The GMA has been hinting at this type of strategy since last November, when a state GMO-labeling initiative in Washington was defeated thanks to heavy spending by food and biotech firms. In December, the group petitioned the FDA asking them to define "natural" once and for all, specifying that the definition should include foods made with GE ingredients.

The FDA denied that petition in March, so it appears the GMA and biotech companies have taken their fight to Congress. The new bill falls in lock step with legislative language that the GMA proposed earlier in 2014.

In a press call, Rep. Pompeo said that GE foods were "safe," "equally healthy" to non-GE foods and required no special labeling. He also called GE foods "an enormous boon to all humanity."

"It is reprehensible that Representative Pompeo has allowed himself to be goat-roped into this dead-on-arrival legislation," says Scott Faber, senior vice president for government affairs for the nonprofit Environmental Working Group, which is fighting the bill. "Preempting states from giving consumers the right to know has about as much chance passing through the Senate as a snowball in Sarasota."

Currently, 27 state legislatures are debating bills or ballot initiatives that would require the labeling of GE foods. Connecticut and Maine have both passed GE labeling laws, but both include trigger clauses that prevent the laws from going into effect until neighboring states do the same. Vermont, on the other hand, is very close to passing the first "no strings attached" GE labeling law in the country, says Colin O'Neil, director of government affairs for another pro-labeling group, the Center for Food Safety. "We're not surprised that the food industry is moving with such urgency to block states and consumers from knowing what's in their food," he says. "They're afraid of state action and now they're trying to steal away consumer choice in Congress."

Despite the fact that surveys consistently show that over 90 percent of Americans want GE
foods labeled, the groups opposing Rep. Pompeo's bill are concerned that the massive coffers and lobbying clout of the food and biotech industries will overpower the public's will—so they're trying to get the word out now to get people involved.

Contact your representatives in Congress and demand that they vote against this pro-GMO bill, and then contact the bill's sponsors—Rep. Pompeo, Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), and Rep. G.K. Butterfield (D-NC)—and express your outrage at their support!

You can also submit a letter to your representatives on the Center for Food Safety's website.

via Rodale News http://ift.tt/1elRtlu

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

Holey Frack: Utah is Starting to Look Like Swiss Cheese

Fracking, Hydraulic Fracking, Utah, environmental distruction, natural gas, oil, energy, earthquakes, methane, green house gas, Google Earth, waste pools Fracking, Hydraulic Fracking, Utah, environmental distruction, natural gas, oil, energy, earthquakes, methane, green house gas, Google Earth, waste pools Fracking, Hydraulic Fracking, Utah, environmental distruction, natural gas, oil, energy, earthquakes, methane, green house gas, Google Earth, waste pools Fracking, Hydraulic Fracking, Utah, environmental distruction, natural gas, oil, energy, earthquakes, methane, green house gas, Google Earth, waste pools Fracking, Hydraulic Fracking, Utah, environmental distruction, natural gas, oil, energy, earthquakes, methane, green house gas, Google Earth, waste pools Fracking, Hydraulic Fracking, Utah, environmental distruction, natural gas, oil, energy, earthquakes, methane, green house gas, Google Earth, waste pools Fracking, Hydraulic Fracking, Utah, environmental distruction, natural gas, oil, energy, earthquakes, methane, green house gas, Google Earth, waste pools

Read the rest of Holey Frack: Utah is Starting to Look Like Swiss Cheese

Fracking is a big, rising industry in the United States both in scale and the sheer amount of landscape
 that stands to change. Utah in particular is starting to look more like Swiss cheese as it continues to 
open up more oil and natural gas fracking sites. To show just how devastating fracking can be, 
Daily Kos put together a small batch of Google Earth images showcasing immensely large and 
eerily multicolored waste pools of some fracking sites. The image you see above shows just one 
of the sites that is nearly a mile wide on each side. The scale of the pools is also comically large 
compared to nearby truck containers.

via INHABITAT 

Tuesday, September 17, 2013

12 Tips for Going Green in College


The best four years of your life seem to go by in a blur of classes, your social life (Greek-lettered or otherwise), and…sleeping till noon. It's finally your life, and you get to do whatever you want! So why not make the autonomous decision to do what you can to live a greener, healthier lifestyle?

It's important that we, as the future movers and shakers of America, think about how our current behaviors are affecting the environment and our future. Wouldn't you like to graduate and head out into in a world that isn't insanely hot and filled with garbage? Here are 13 tips for going green NOW so you can enjoy the planet and a greener, brighter future.

#1: Unplug your cellphone, iPad, TV, laptop, and such, post charging.
Your dad probably bought you four power strips during your freshman year in an effort to be over-prepared. Use them! Plug all your device chargers into one strip and then shut off the strip when they're finished charging. It takes four seconds and it's an easy way to conserve energy.

#2: Wash your laundry in cold water and let it air-dry.
Going from having your mom do your laundry to doing it yourself can be a nightmare. What exactly do all those buttons mean?! If your university uses washers and dryers that don't allow you to manually change the water temperature, selecting the "delicate" cycle will allow you to wash your clothes in cold water. Washing in cold water saves energy and prevents your fabrics from fading. Also, make sure your loads are FULL! This allows for fewer loads and, therefore, less water use. When it comes to drying, invest in a drying rack. It costs around $10, and air-drying, while good for the environment, also prevents your clothes from shrinking. Besides, it saves you a boatload of quarters.

#3: Ditch the plastic water bottles.
Here's an economics lesson that you don't need to pay $500-a-credit-hour for: Paying 1,900 times MORE for something that flows freely from a tap is BAD. But that's what you're doing whenever you buy bottled water—and it's a waste of plastic, to boot. Shell out $20 for a good reusable water bottle that will save you a fortune on bottled water (and probably last way longer than your four years on campus).

#4: Buy a mug.
While you're shopping for beverage containers…invest in a ceramic cup or a stainless steel travel mug and pledge to ditch those paper cups from your college's coffee shop. You might even get lucky and score a discount on the drinks you buy.

#5: Put the car keys down.
Chicks dig a dude on a bike. While you should probably leave your Harley at home, try opting for a bicycle as your main transport. The benefits are numerous: Your commute to class is exercise, you're not polluting, and you're saving money on gas. If that's not a win/win/win situation then what is?

#6: Print less.
Is it really necessary for you to print out your professor's entire published works…single-sided? Nope. Use your e-reader or iPad to read the document and to bring notes to class. Just make sure to keep the Fruit Ninja–playing in class to a minimum!

#7: Print double-sided.
When you must print, print double-sided. This way you cut your paper use in half, shaving a few pennies off your printing supplies bill in the process. And while you're at it, use recycled paper for heaven's sake! Every major office store sells it now.

#8: Rent!
Textbooks are expensive and are you REALLY going to consult your calculus textbook thirty years from now? Take advantage of your university's textbook rental service if it has one. If not, go online. Even Amazon rents textbooks now.

#9: Clean naturally.
Sharing a bathroom can be gross. That doesn't mean you need to expose yourself to harsh chemicals in order to get it clean. Instead of all the bleach, try using a vinegar solution or one of these cheap, easy homemade cleaning recipes that work to clean your bathroom surfaces. They're better for the environment, and you'll be able to use your teeny-tiny dorm bathroom without falling prey to a coughing fit.

#10: Turn off the tap.
When brushing your teeth, turn the faucet off while scrubbing away. When showering, turn off the water while you're shampooing, turning it back on to rinse. Every few seconds count!

#11: Recycle…everything.
Everyone knows you can recycle paper and plastic—but not everyone does it. In fact, college kids are less likely than older generations to recycle, according to surveys by the Pew Research Center. So be the change! Learn to love the blue and green bins! You can recycle other items too, such as clothes. Cut up old T-shirts to use as cleaning rags, or donate them to charity. And here's how you can make money off clothes in good condition that you no longer want. Check out earth911.com to find umpteen dozen ways to recycle anything and everything you need to dump. Just think twice before you toss something into the landfill.

#12: Talk to your student government.
If making your campus a greener place is important to you, talk to your student senate. You'd be surprised about how many students share your sentiments. The more voices are heard, the more the college will do to heed the demand. What do we want? Utensils made from vegetable fibers! When do we want them? NOW!


via Rodale News http://www.rodale.com/tips-going-green



Monday, September 16, 2013

“Natural” on food labels? Ain’t necessarily so…


Q: I am doing legislative research on food policy for one of my state's senators on the definition of "natural." As things stand, it's difficult for consumers to understand what "natural" means on food labels. How should the FDA define this term so it is accurate and not misleading?

A: I was traveling in New England when your question arrived, and it sent me right to the nearest Hannaford supermarket. Hannaford makes this research easy. Sections everywhere in the store are labeled "organic and natural."

Organic is no problem. Certified organic products must be made with ingredients raised or grown without artificial fertilizers, pesticides, hormones, antibiotics, irradiation, sewage sludge or genetic modification.

But what are we to make of Honey BBQ All Natural Potato Chips containing 20 ingredients, among them monosodium glutamate, yellow food color, and undoubtedly genetically modified corn and soy, but "no hydrogenated fats and gluten free"? Or Healthy Natural Dog Food containing meat by-products and other such things but "no artificial preservatives, colors or fillers"?

The Food and Drug Administration is not much help. Its answer: "From a food science perspective, it is difficult to define a food product that is 'natural' because the food has probably been processed and is no longer the product of the earth. That said, FDA … has not objected to the use of the term if the food does not contain added color, artificial flavors or synthetic substances."

If you have made it through all the not's in this non-definition, you can begin to understand how the FDA can allow high-fructose corn syrup to be "natural." Even though enzymes, synthetic or not, are required to convert cornstarch to this mixture of glucose and fructose, it does not contain artificial colors or flavors.

But the products I mentioned do. Yellow No. 5 is an artificial color. You must assume that the corn or soy in any "natural" product is genetically modified unless the label says GMO-free or Certified Organic. You may be someone who has a hard time considering GMO ingredients "natural."

In the last decade, new products marketed with "natural" claims have proliferated, and it's easy to understand why. Marketers love the term. "Natural" sells products, not the least because consumers consider it a synonym for healthful and, often, for organic. Anyone would rather buy "100 percent natural seltzer water" – "calorie-free, no sugar, no sodium, gluten-free" (things never found in water) – than plain seltzer.

While "natural" does not necessarily mean "healthy" or even "healthier," it works splendidly as a marketing term and explains why many junk-food manufacturers are switching from expensive organic ingredients to those they can market as "natural."
The FDA isn't fixing this situation because, according to a statement in response to a petition by Center for Science in the Public Interest, it's "not an enforcement priority."

Manufacturers of highly processed foods could not be happier with this nondecision.

In the absence of regulation, enter litigation. In recent years, advocacy groups have filed dozens of lawsuits seeking to ban "natural" claims on foods containing ingredients that seem unnatural, especially those genetically modified. Judges tend to say it's the FDA's problem and are calling on the agency to define the term.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture, which is responsible for meat and dairy products, has attempted to clarify what it means by "natural." Its Food Safety and Inspection Service says meat and poultry can be labeled "natural" when they are minimally processed and have no artificial flavorings, colorings or preservatives. USDA's Agricultural Marketing Service says "naturally raised" means the meat must come from animals produced with no hormone growth promoters, no antibiotics and no animal by-products.

How about all of the above? And if the public really can't tell the difference between "natural" and "organic," the closer the definition of "natural" is to that of "organic," the less confused they will be.

Perhaps you could advise the senator to begin with the organic standards. And then toss in working definitions that exclude anything synthetic, artificial and more than minimally processed.

You should expect food industry lobbying against this idea to be fierce. But the public will be better served if the compromises in defining "natural" come at the end of the negotiations rather than at the beginning.

Marion Nestle is the author of "Why Calories Count: From Science to Politics," "Food Politics" and "What to Eat," among other books. She is a professor in the nutrition, food studies and public health department at New York University, and blogs at www.foodpolitics.com. E-mail:food@sfchronicle.com


via Food Politics http://www.foodpolitics.com/2013/09/natural-on-food-labels-aint-necessarily-so/